🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.