🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents praising your advice on growing your venture? Do recruiters making contact to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women participated in an organized professional network test recently after viral posts indicated that changing their profile gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts appear to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decrease substantially.

The Method

• First, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with comparable "assertive" language

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and confident - similar to a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, saying "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers experienced positive results. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by male and female users received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."